Now accepting Q2 projects — limited slots available. Get started →
English Espanol Francais Deutsch 中文 한국어 日本語 Portugues العربية Nederlands 繁體中文
AI Engineering
Claude CodeSubagents + HooksSenior Review

개발사가 MVP에 3개월을 견적했습니다. Claude Code로 9일 안에 배포합니다.

우리는 'AI를 사용하는' 에이전시가 아닙니다. Claude Code가 우리의 배포 도구입니다 -- subagents, hooks, skills, 전체 워크플로우 -- 2014년부터 5,000+ 사이트를 배포한 시니어 엔지니어들의 지원을 받습니다.

1,300/mo
Search Volume
"claude code agency"
5,000+
Sites Shipped
Since 2014
9 days
Avg MVP
Vs 3 months traditional
95+
Lighthouse
Production target
What a Claude Code agency is

A Claude Code agency is a development shop that uses Claude Code as its primary delivery vehicle -- not a sidekick, not a typeahead. The subagent pattern, the hooks system, and the skills library are wired into the day-to-day workflow. Senior engineers review every PR. Claude writes most of the code, humans own the architecture and the call on what gets merged. The result is production output that ships in days instead of months, without the 'AI slop' that kills most LLM-generated codebases at month three.

프로젝트가 실패하는 이유

You hired a traditional dev shop and they quoted 3 months for a 5-screen MVP By the time it ships, your market window is half closed. Two competitors launched. The board is asking why a basic auth + CRUD app took a quarter.
Your in-house team is 'using Claude' but the output reads like Stack Overflow circa 2018 Hallucinated API calls. Missing error handling. No tests. Code that looks fine in review and breaks in week two. The AI multiplier becomes an AI tax.
You built a Claude Code prototype yourself and it works -- until you try to put real users on it No RLS policies. Auth checks in the wrong layer. No observability. The first 50 users find five bugs each. Now you're rewriting it under pressure.
You want the velocity of AI-assisted dev but cannot stomach unreviewed AI code in production Most 'AI dev agencies' are juniors with API access. The trade-off is real -- raw speed without judgment burns you on the second iteration when the codebase needs to flex.

컴플라이언스

Senior Review on Every PR

Claude writes the code. A senior engineer with 10+ years of production experience reviews every PR before merge. No exceptions, including on tight deadlines. This is the line that separates Claude Code agencies from prompt-and-pray shops.

TDD Skill Runs First

Tests get written and reviewed before implementation lands. The TDD skill is wired into our Claude Code setup so the loop is: spec -> failing test -> implementation -> passing test -> human review -> merge. Catches hallucinations early.

Subagents for QA

A code-review subagent runs against every PR before a human sees it. Flags hallucinated imports, unsafe SQL, missing auth checks, and undefined behavior. The human reviewer starts from a clean baseline instead of hunting basics.

Hooks Block Bad Commits

Pre-commit hooks block any commit that fails lint, type-check, or the test suite. Pre-push hooks run the full integration suite. Branch protection requires green CI. The harness enforces standards Claude would otherwise drift on under pressure.

우리가 만드는 것

Claude Code subagents tailored to your stack -- so QA, security review, and SEO checks run automatically on every PR

Your reviewers stop catching the same five issues every sprint. The subagents handle the boring 80% and surface the actual judgment calls.

Hooks that gate every commit on lint, types, tests, and a custom rule set you own

Production codebases stop drifting. The hook layer becomes the contract that keeps Claude on-pattern even three months into the project.

A skills library specific to your domain -- deploys, migrations, schema changes, SEO audits, all callable as one-line commands

Repeatable workflows stop being tribal knowledge. New team members hit productivity in week one instead of month two.

Production-grade observability, RLS, auth, and error handling baked in from day one -- not bolted on at launch

The MVP ships as a real production app. No "we will harden it later" technical debt that compounds for the next two years.

우리의 프로세스

01

Discovery + Architecture

30-minute call, then a written architecture doc covering data model, auth flows, routes, and the subagent / hook layer specific to your build. You see exactly what we're going to ship before we write a line of code.
Day 1-2
02

Foundation Sprint

Repo, CI, hooks, skills, auth, RLS, database schema, deploy pipeline. The boring-but-critical scaffolding that most agencies skip and most prototypes lack. Claude Code handles the implementation, we review every line.
Day 3-5
03

Feature Build

Screens, flows, API routes, and integrations. Daily PRs reviewed by a senior engineer. You join the PR thread and approve direction in real time. No two-week black boxes.
Day 6-12
04

Hand-Off + Pairing

Full repo walkthrough, runbook, deploy hand-off. Optional 2-4 week pairing block where we sit alongside your team while they extend the build. Most clients take this option.
Day 13+

자주 묻는 질문

What does a Claude Code agency actually do differently?

We build with Claude Code as the primary delivery surface -- not as a chat sidekick. That means subagents for QA, hooks that gate every commit, skills for repeatable workflows like deploys and SEO checks. The human engineer reviews architecture and design decisions. Claude writes 70-80% of the code, but a senior reviews 100% of it before merge. See how we run it: /blog/claude-code-agency-workflow.

How do you avoid 'AI slop' code in production?

Three gates. First, a TDD skill runs before any implementation -- tests are written and reviewed by a human before code lands. Second, a code-review subagent flags hallucinated APIs, unsafe patterns, and missing error handling. Third, every PR gets human review from someone who's shipped production code for 10+ years. Details: /blog/claude-code-skills-subagents-hooks-agency-qa-pipeline-2026.

Is Claude Code actually faster than hiring a developer?

For greenfield MVPs, yes -- typically 4-6x faster end to end. A 3-month MVP quote from a traditional shop ships in 9-12 days for us. For existing codebase changes, the gap narrows to 2-3x because most of the time is reading and understanding context, which is mostly human work. We won't pretend it's magic. Senior engineering judgment is still the bottleneck on hard problems.

What stack do you build on?

Next.js (App Router) or Astro for the frontend, Supabase for Postgres + Auth + Storage, Vercel for hosting. We do not build on WordPress, and we will tell you up front if your project is better served by a no-code tool. See /migrate/wordpress-to-nextjs for the most common upgrade path we run.

Can you migrate an existing Claude Code prototype to production?

Yes. We have a dedicated migration workflow at /migrate/claude-code-plan-to-production. Most prototypes need hardening on auth, RLS, error states, observability, and CI. Plan on 2-4 weeks for a proper production hand-off depending on the surface area.

What does a project cost?

MVP with auth + 5-8 screens + Supabase backend: $8,000 to $18,000. Production SaaS rebuild: $25,000 to $60,000. We share a fixed-fee quote within 24 hours of the discovery call. No hourly billing, no surprise change orders.

Will you ghostwrite for our team or work alongside them?

Either way. Most clients run hybrid -- we ship the build, then pair with their team for 2-4 weeks so they can extend it confidently. Some clients hand off the repo and never look back. Both are fine.

From $8,000
MVP. Auth + Supabase + 5-8 screens.
See pricing ->
How Our Claude Code Agency Workflow Actually RunsClaude Code Skills, Subagents, Hooks -- Our QA Pipeline (2026)Claude Code Plan to Production -- Migration PathCustom Web Development -- Senior Engineering Without the Big-4 BillNext.js Development -- App Router, Server Components, ISRWordPress to Next.js MigrationAI Integration for SaaS -- LLM Wiring Without the Hallucination TaxCustom vs Off-the-Shelf: When AI-Assisted Dev Wins

Brief Us On Your Build

We'll respond within 24 hours with a fixed-fee scope.

Book a 30-min Claude Code Build Call
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →