Skip to content
Now accepting new projects — limited slots available. Get started →
Enterprise / Tu Demo de IA Funciona. Tu Sistema en Producción, No.
Enterprise Capability

Tu Demo de IA Funciona. Tu Sistema en Producción, No.

Si eres un líder de ingeniería viendo cómo tu prototipo LLM colapsa bajo el volumen real de consultas, has chocado contra el muro de orquestación.

CTO / VP Engineering / Head of AI at 200-5000 employee company with significant document processing or workflow automation needs
$50,000 - $300,000
137,000+
listings managed
NAS directory platform — same data pipeline patterns power RAG ingestion
91,000+
dynamic pages indexed
Content platform proving performant frontends on heavy data processing
30
languages deployed
Korean manufacturer hub — multi-tenant internationalized architecture
sub-200ms
real-time bid latency
Auction platform — same streaming architecture for LLM responses
Lighthouse 95+
performance score
Maintained across all enterprise projects including AI-powered interfaces
Architecture

Provider-agnostic LLM orchestration layer on Vercel Edge Functions with intelligent routing between Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini. RAG pipelines use Supabase pgvector for hybrid vector + relational search with cross-encoder re-ranking, backed by event-driven document processing on Inngest/Trigger.dev for durable serverless workflows. Next.js frontend with Vercel AI SDK handles streaming responses and role-based access control.

Dónde fallan los proyectos empresariales

Here's the thing about building with multiple LLMs -- it sounds great in theory until you're three months in and your team has written more abstraction code than actual product features Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini all have different API contracts, different rate limit behaviors, and they fail in completely different ways. So you end up with engineers spending 6+ months -- sometimes longer -- building and maintaining provider abstraction layers just to keep the lights on. That's not shipping. That's treading water. And the real kicker? Every time one of these providers updates their API or changes their token limits, you're back in the weeds. We've watched promising AI products stall completely because the infrastructure complexity ate the roadmap whole. Teams in New York, Austin, London -- doesn't matter where -- they all hit the same wall eventually. The actual business logic, the features your users care about -- those keep getting pushed to next sprint. Then the sprint after that. It's a genuinely painful problem, and it compounds the longer you wait to address it properly. What starts as a two-week abstraction task quietly becomes a six-month engineering sinkhole, and by the time anyone calls it what it is, you've burned through runway that was supposed to fund actual product development. We've seen this kill momentum at companies that had everything else going for them -- solid funding, great domain expertise, real user demand. The infrastructure complexity just ate them alive before they could ship anything worth talking about.
RAG pipelines that work beautifully on clean markdown docs? Pretty straightforward But real enterprise documents are a disaster -- scanned PDFs from 2009, tables with merged cells, Word files where someone's been copy-pasting since Obama's first term. Accuracy falls apart fast. And in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, a hallucinated output isn't just embarrassing -- it's a compliance exposure that can cost you real money and real trust. We're talking potential SEC scrutiny or HIPAA headaches, not just an awkward conversation with a client.
Most teams we talk to have made serious LLM investments but still have someone manually moving documents between systems There's no actual pipeline connecting ingestion to the workflows that need the output. That gap kills your ROI on AI spend. Honestly, it's like buying a Ferrari and leaving it in the garage because you haven't built the driveway yet. The model isn't the hard part -- the plumbing around it is.
Token costs are sneaky Everything looks fine in staging, then you hit production scale across three LLM providers and suddenly nobody knows which team ran up a $40,000 bill in February. Without per-department visibility and actual enforcement, "unpredictable monthly API costs" is putting it charitably. Budgets get blown. Finance gets angry. Engineers get blamed. And then everyone spends two weeks in retrospectives instead of building anything.

Qué entregamos

Multi-Provider LLM Orchestration

We build routing that doesn't care which provider it's talking to -- Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, whatever's next. Automatic failover kicks in when a provider degrades, and prompts get adapted on the fly to match each model's instruction format. Token budgets get enforced at the user and department level. So if the marketing team has a $5,000 monthly ceiling, that ceiling actually holds. Not "holds until someone runs a batch job" -- actually holds.

Production RAG Pipeline

Single-vector search works until it doesn't -- usually right when a user searches for something that's phrased differently than how it was written in the source doc. So we combine pgvector dense search with BM25 keyword matching, then run a cross-encoder re-ranking pass to pull the most relevant chunks to the top. Generated responses include source citations. And we've got hallucination detection baked in, not bolted on after the fact as an afterthought.

Enterprise Document Processing

Documents don't arrive clean or on schedule. PDFs, Word files, emails, scanned images -- they show up in batches, out of order, inconsistently formatted. Our ingestion pipeline handles all of it with event-driven processing: classification, structured data extraction, and downstream workflow triggers that fire automatically once processing completes. No manual handoffs sitting in someone's queue waiting for them to get back from lunch.

Streaming AI Interface

The frontend is built on Next.js with the Vercel AI SDK, which gets you sub-second time-to-first-token -- users see responses starting immediately, not after a 4-second spinner. Real-time progress indicators keep people oriented during longer processing tasks. And role-based access control plugs into whatever auth provider you're already running -- Auth0, Clerk, your own homegrown system. We're not asking you to rip anything out.

Workflow Automation Engine

Multi-step AI workflows fail in interesting ways. A document processing job might hit an LLM timeout on step 3 of 7, and you need that retry to pick up exactly where it left off -- not restart from scratch and reprocess six steps you already paid for. We use Inngest or Trigger.dev for durable serverless orchestration, which means retries, observability, and clean integration with CRMs, ERPs, and notification systems are handled properly from day one. Not day 90 when something finally breaks in production.

Cost and Compliance Observability

You can't manage what you can't see. Real-time dashboards give you token usage, cost-per-query, model performance metrics, and a complete audit trail for every AI interaction. Not weekly CSV exports -- actual live visibility, per department, per workflow, per user if you need it. When something looks off, you know in minutes, not at the end of the month when the invoice lands.

Preguntas frecuentes

¿Cómo gestionáis el failover entre múltiples proveedores LLM como Claude, GPT-4o y Gemini?

Construimos una capa de orquestación agnóstica al proveedor que monitoriza el estado de la API, la latencia y las tasas de error en tiempo real. Cuando un proveedor se degrada o empieza a devolver errores 529, las solicitudes se redirigen automáticamente al siguiente modelo disponible más adecuado — con adaptación de prompts para gestionar las diferencias en cómo Claude versus GPT-4o versus Gemini espera que se formateen las instrucciones. Los presupuestos de tokens y las restricciones de coste también influyen en esas decisiones de enrutamiento, no solo el rendimiento bruto. ¿Y sinceramente? Sin intervención manual cuando OpenAI tiene un mal martes por la mañana. Tus usuarios no se enteran. Tu ingeniero de guardia no recibe una alerta a las 2am. Eso solo ya vale mucho.

¿Qué base de datos vectorial recomendáis para pipelines RAG empresariales?

Para la mayoría de los despliegues, empezamos con Supabase y pgvector — obtienes búsqueda vectorial funcionando justo junto a tus consultas relacionales, seguridad a nivel de fila para acceso multi-tenant, y una dependencia de infraestructura menos que explicar a tu equipo de DevOps. Pero los clientes que procesan millones de documentos o que necesitan recuperación en menos de 10ms son una conversación diferente. Esos reciben vector stores dedicados — Pinecone o Weaviate — corriendo junto a la base de datos principal. No es una decisión única para todos. Depende de tu volumen real de consultas y tus requisitos de latencia, no de lo que suene impresionante en un pitch deck.

¿Cómo reducís las alucinaciones en las respuestas de IA impulsadas por RAG?

Usamos un enfoque multicapa porque ninguna técnica aislada te lleva hasta allí. La recuperación híbrida combina vectores densos con coincidencia de palabras clave BM25. El re-ranking con cross-encoder mejora la relevancia de los fragmentos antes de que nada llegue al LLM. Los system prompts incluyen instrucciones estrictas de fundamentación. Luego un pase de verificación secundario contrasta las afirmaciones generadas con los fragmentos fuente después del hecho. Cada respuesta incluye citas con referencias a nivel de página de vuelta a los documentos originales — porque tus usuarios no deberían limitarse a confiar en el output. Deberían poder verificarlo en 30 segundos.

¿Cuánto cuesta un proyecto de integración de IA empresarial y cuánto tiempo lleva?

Los proyectos normalmente oscilan entre 50.000 y 300.000 dólares dependiendo del volumen documental, el número de flujos de trabajo LLM y la cantidad de sistemas con los que integramos. Un compromiso estándar es de 12 a 16 semanas desde el descubrimiento hasta el despliegue en producción. Pero tendrás un MVP funcional en la semana 8 — usuarios reales, documentos reales, flujos de trabajo reales — para que puedas validar el enfoque antes de que endurezcamos todo para la escala de producción completa. Sin gran revelación al final donde todo el mundo aguanta la respiración y espera que funcione.

¿Podéis integrar flujos de trabajo de IA con nuestros sistemas empresariales existentes como Salesforce o SAP?

Sí. Los pipelines de procesamiento documental están orientados a eventos, y usamos integraciones basadas en webhooks para conectar sistemas downstream. Hemos construido conectores para Salesforce, HubSpot, SAP, SharePoint y muchas herramientas internas personalizadas — si tiene una API, podemos conectarlo. La capa de orquestación activa acciones basadas en los resultados del procesamiento de IA: actualizaciones de registros en el CRM, flujos de trabajo de aprobación, notificaciones en Slack, lo que el proceso requiera. Todo ello con registro de auditoría, porque en industrias reguladas eso no es opcional — es el núcleo del asunto.

¿Cómo gestionáis los datos empresariales sensibles en los pipelines de procesamiento de IA?

La seguridad a nivel de fila en Supabase hace que el acceso a documentos en las consultas RAG respete tu modelo de permisos existente — alguien en la oficina de Londres no recupera documentos que no debería ver solo por formular una pregunta de forma inteligente. Todos los datos permanecen dentro de tu infraestructura cloud. Desplegamos en tus cuentas de AWS, GCP o Azure, no en las nuestras. Para industrias reguladas — salud, finanzas, legal — añadimos detección y redacción de PII antes de que los documentos lleguen al pipeline LLM. Y todas las llamadas a la API se ejecutan bajo acuerdos de proveedor de nivel empresarial con adendas de tratamiento de datos ya vigentes.

Ver esta capacidad en acción

NAS Equipment Directory Platform

Data pipeline and search architecture managing 137K+ listings that informed our RAG ingestion and retrieval patterns

Astrology Content Platform

91K+ dynamically generated pages proving performant Next.js frontends on top of heavy content processing pipelines

Real-Time Auction Platform

Sub-200ms streaming architecture that directly translates to low-latency LLM response delivery

Korean Manufacturer Global Hub

Multi-tenant internationalized platform across 30 languages demonstrating enterprise-scale data architecture

Headless CMS Development

Content management architecture patterns that power document ingestion and structured content delivery in AI workflows
Compromiso empresarial

Schedule Discovery Session

Mapeamos tu arquitectura de plataforma, identificamos riesgos no obvios y te damos un alcance realista — gratis, sin compromiso.

Schedule Discovery Call
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →