Now accepting Q2 projects — limited slots available. Get started →

中文 Nederlands Espanol Francais 한국어 日本語 Portugues Deutsch العربية 繁體中文 English

Healthcare & HIPAA Compliance

45 CFR § 164.308NIST 800-66OCR Audit Protocol

تدقيق الامتثال لـ HIPAA وتقييم مخاطر الأمان

تحليل مخاطر الأمان المصمم لمراقبة OCR

100%

ePHI Safeguards

Administrative, physical, technical

75+

Control Points

NIST 800-66 mapped

OCR Findings

Across client audits

48hr

Gap Report Delivery

After initial assessment

What Is a HIPAA Security Risk Assessment?

A HIPAA security risk assessment is a formal evaluation required under 45 CFR § 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A). It identifies threats and vulnerabilities to electronic protected health information (ePHI), then checks your web application's technical, administrative, and physical safeguards against NIST 800-66 controls and the OCR audit protocol. The result is a clear picture of residual risk — plus a remediation plan that holds up to federal enforcement.

أين تفشل المشاريع

Your web application handles ePHI but has never gone through a formal SRA OCR treats a missing risk analysis as a per-violation penalty — up to $2.13M per category.

Developers built authentication but skipped access controls mapped to workforce roles That violates § 164.312(a)(1) — the access control standard OCR cites more than anything else.

Audit logs exist but don't capture the six required data points per NIST 800-66 Incomplete audit trails fail the OCR audit protocol's Activity Review requirement.

You signed a BAA with your cloud provider but never actually verified their controls Covered entities are still on the hook for ePHI breaches caused by business associate negligence.

Your team treats HIPAA compliance as a one-time checkbox rather than ongoing risk management § 164.308(a)(8) requires periodic technical and non-technical evaluations — and OCR checks the timestamps.

Encryption gets applied inconsistently across data at rest and in transit Unencrypted ePHI breaches don't qualify for safe harbor under the Breach Notification Rule. That's a problem.

الامتثال

Administrative Safeguard Mapping

We map every § 164.308 administrative safeguard directly to your application architecture — security management processes, workforce security, and information access management controls included.

Technical Safeguard Validation

Access controls, audit controls, integrity controls, and transmission security are all verified against § 164.312 requirements. Each control gets tested against your production environment.

NIST 800-66 Control Alignment

Every identified risk gets mapped to the corresponding NIST 800-66 Rev1 activity. You'll receive a crosswalk document that OCR auditors recognize and accept.

OCR Audit Protocol Readiness

We evaluate your application against all 180 OCR audit protocol elements covering Privacy, Security, and Breach Notification Rules. Gap findings are ranked by enforcement risk.

Encryption & Key Management Review

AES-256 at rest, TLS 1.3 in transit, key rotation policies — all assessed against NIST standards. We verify your implementation actually protects ePHI, not just that it looks good on paper.

Risk Register & Remediation Roadmap

The deliverable includes a scored risk register with likelihood, impact, and residual risk calculations. Each finding comes with a concrete remediation task your development team can act on immediately.

ما نبنيه

ePHI Flow Diagrams

A visual map of every ePHI touchpoint — from ingestion through storage, processing, transmission, and disposal — across your entire application stack.

Row-Level Security Audit

Verification that database access policies enforce minimum necessary access at the row and column level for every user role.

Penetration Testing

Targeted penetration tests against authentication, session management, and API endpoints that handle ePHI.

BAA Compliance Review

Analysis of all business associate agreements against actual subprocessor controls and data handling practices.

Incident Response Plan Validation

Testing your breach notification workflow against the 60-day reporting requirement and any applicable state notification laws.

Continuous Monitoring Architecture

Design and implementation of automated compliance monitoring that satisfies the periodic evaluation standard under § 164.308(a)(8).

عمليتنا

Scope & ePHI Inventory

We identify every system, database, API, and third-party service that creates, receives, maintains, or transmits ePHI. That defines the assessment boundary.

Week 1

Threat & Vulnerability Analysis

Threats and vulnerabilities are identified systematically and mapped to each ePHI asset using NIST 800-30 methodology for consistent risk scoring.

Week 2

Control Assessment & Gap Analysis

Every existing safeguard gets tested against § 164.308, § 164.310, and § 164.312 requirements alongside NIST 800-66 activities. Gaps are documented with evidence.

Week 3

Risk Scoring & Remediation Plan

Residual risks are scored by likelihood and impact. You get a prioritized remediation roadmap with estimated effort, responsible parties, and target completion dates.

Week 4

Remediation & Verification

We implement technical fixes directly in your application — access controls, encryption, audit logging, secure configurations — and verify each remediation actually closes the identified gap.

Weeks 5-8

Next.jsSupabaseVercelRow-Level SecurityAES-256 EncryptionSOC 2 InfrastructureAudit Logging

الأسئلة الشائعة

هل تقييم مخاطر أمان HIPAA مطلوب قانونياً؟

نعم. يتطلب 45 CFR § 164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) من كل كيان مغطى ومرتبط تجاري إجراء تقييم دقيق وشامل للمخاطر المحتملة والثغرات في ePHI. فرضت OCR غرامات تتجاوز 1 مليون دولار تحديداً لتخطي هذه الخطوة. حجم المنظمة لا يهم. هذا ليس اختيارياً.

كم مرة يجب إجراء تقييم مخاطر HIPAA؟

اللائحة لا تحدد جدولاً ثابتاً، لكن § 164.308(a)(8) تتطلب تقييمات تقنية وغير تقنية دورية. يشير إرشاد OCR وسجل الإنفاذ كلاهما إلى أن سنوياً هو الحد الأدنى المتوقع. يجب عليك أيضاً إعادة التقييم بعد تغييرات النظام الكبيرة أو التكاملات الجديدة أو حوادث الأمان.

ما الفرق بين NIST 800-66 وبروتوكول تدقيق OCR؟

NIST 800-66 هو دليل تنفيذ طوعي يربط متطلبات HIPAA Security Rule بأنشطة وضوابط تقييم محددة. بروتوكول تدقيق OCR هو قائمة الفحص التي يستخدمها HHS أثناء تدقيق الامتثال. نحن نوافق على كليهما — NIST 800-66 للدقة التقنية، بروتوكول OCR للاستعداد للتدقيق.

هل يمكنك تقييم تطبيق ويب مبني على مكدس تقني مختلف؟

نعم. نحن متخصصون في Next.js و Supabase ومكدسات JavaScript الحديثة، لكن منهجية تقييم HIPAA لدينا تعمل بغض النظر عن الإطار. نحن نقيم ضوابط الأمان، وليس اللغة. لقد قيمنا تطبيقات مبنية على Rails و Django و Laravel و .NET والمنصات PHP القديمة.

ما المسلمات التي نتلقاها بعد التقييم؟

ستتلقى سجل مخاطر كامل مع النتائج المسجلة، ورسم تخطيطي لتدفق بيانات ePHI، وثيقة ربط NIST 800-66، تقرير تحليل الفجوات المعين لعناصر بروتوكول تدقيق OCR، وخارطة طريق معالجة محددة الأولويات مع إرشادات التنفيذ. كل شيء منسق لمراجعة الجهات الحكومية.

هل تصلح أيضاً الثغرات التي تجدها؟

نعم. بخلاف شركات الامتثال التي توقفت عند التقارير، نحن فريق تطوير. نطبق معالجات تقنية — ضوابط الوصول والتشفير وتسجيل التدقيق وتصميم API آمن — مباشرة في قاعدة الكود الخاصة بك. يتم التحقق من كل إصلاح مقابل النتيجة الأصلية قبل إغلاقها.

HIPAA Security Risk Assessment from $8,000

Fixed-fee. Includes risk register, remediation roadmap, and 30-day post-delivery support.

See all packages →

Next.js Development Core Web Vitals Optimization Guide WordPress to Next.js Migration

Get Your Free HIPAA Risk Assessment Scoping Call

We'll deliver a scoping document and quote within 48 hours.

Get a Free HIPAA Scoping Call

Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →