Skip to content
Now accepting Q2 projects — limited slots available. Get started →
Enterprise / AI Integration & Automation Platform Development
Enterprise Capability

AI Integration & Automation Platform Development

Production-grade LLM orchestration and RAG pipelines that ship

CTO / VP Engineering / Head of AI at 200-5000 employee company with significant document processing or workflow automation needs
$50,000 - $300,000
137,000+
listings managed
NAS directory platform — same data pipeline patterns power RAG ingestion
91,000+
dynamic pages indexed
Content platform proving performant frontends on heavy data processing
30
languages deployed
Korean manufacturer hub — multi-tenant internationalized architecture
sub-200ms
real-time bid latency
Auction platform — same streaming architecture for LLM responses
Lighthouse 95+
performance score
Maintained across all enterprise projects including AI-powered interfaces
Architecture

Provider-agnostic LLM orchestration layer on Vercel Edge Functions with intelligent routing between Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini. RAG pipelines use Supabase pgvector for hybrid vector + relational search with cross-encoder re-ranking, backed by event-driven document processing on Inngest/Trigger.dev for durable serverless workflows. Next.js frontend with Vercel AI SDK handles streaming responses and role-based access control.

エンタープライズプロジェクトが失敗する理由

Here's the thing about building with multiple LLMs -- it sounds great in theory until you're three months in and your team has written more abstraction code than actual product features Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini all have different API contracts, different rate limit behaviors, and they fail in completely different ways. So you end up with engineers spending 6+ months -- sometimes longer -- building and maintaining provider abstraction layers just to keep the lights on. That's not shipping. That's treading water. And the real kicker? Every time one of these providers updates their API or changes their token limits, you're back in the weeds. We've watched promising AI products stall completely because the infrastructure complexity ate the roadmap whole. Teams in New York, Austin, London -- doesn't matter where -- they all hit the same wall eventually. The actual business logic, the features your users care about -- those keep getting pushed to next sprint. Then the sprint after that. It's a genuinely painful problem, and it compounds the longer you wait to address it properly. What starts as a two-week abstraction task quietly becomes a six-month engineering sinkhole, and by the time anyone calls it what it is, you've burned through runway that was supposed to fund actual product development. We've seen this kill momentum at companies that had everything else going for them -- solid funding, great domain expertise, real user demand. The infrastructure complexity just ate them alive before they could ship anything worth talking about.
RAG pipelines that work beautifully on clean markdown docs? Pretty straightforward But real enterprise documents are a disaster -- scanned PDFs from 2009, tables with merged cells, Word files where someone's been copy-pasting since Obama's first term. Accuracy falls apart fast. And in regulated industries like finance or healthcare, a hallucinated output isn't just embarrassing -- it's a compliance exposure that can cost you real money and real trust. We're talking potential SEC scrutiny or HIPAA headaches, not just an awkward conversation with a client.
Most teams we talk to have made serious LLM investments but still have someone manually moving documents between systems There's no actual pipeline connecting ingestion to the workflows that need the output. That gap kills your ROI on AI spend. Honestly, it's like buying a Ferrari and leaving it in the garage because you haven't built the driveway yet. The model isn't the hard part -- the plumbing around it is.
Token costs are sneaky Everything looks fine in staging, then you hit production scale across three LLM providers and suddenly nobody knows which team ran up a $40,000 bill in February. Without per-department visibility and actual enforcement, "unpredictable monthly API costs" is putting it charitably. Budgets get blown. Finance gets angry. Engineers get blamed. And then everyone spends two weeks in retrospectives instead of building anything.

提供内容

Multi-Provider LLM Orchestration

We build routing that doesn't care which provider it's talking to -- Claude, GPT-4o, Gemini, whatever's next. Automatic failover kicks in when a provider degrades, and prompts get adapted on the fly to match each model's instruction format. Token budgets get enforced at the user and department level. So if the marketing team has a $5,000 monthly ceiling, that ceiling actually holds. Not "holds until someone runs a batch job" -- actually holds.

Production RAG Pipeline

Single-vector search works until it doesn't -- usually right when a user searches for something that's phrased differently than how it was written in the source doc. So we combine pgvector dense search with BM25 keyword matching, then run a cross-encoder re-ranking pass to pull the most relevant chunks to the top. Generated responses include source citations. And we've got hallucination detection baked in, not bolted on after the fact as an afterthought.

Enterprise Document Processing

Documents don't arrive clean or on schedule. PDFs, Word files, emails, scanned images -- they show up in batches, out of order, inconsistently formatted. Our ingestion pipeline handles all of it with event-driven processing: classification, structured data extraction, and downstream workflow triggers that fire automatically once processing completes. No manual handoffs sitting in someone's queue waiting for them to get back from lunch.

Streaming AI Interface

The frontend is built on Next.js with the Vercel AI SDK, which gets you sub-second time-to-first-token -- users see responses starting immediately, not after a 4-second spinner. Real-time progress indicators keep people oriented during longer processing tasks. And role-based access control plugs into whatever auth provider you're already running -- Auth0, Clerk, your own homegrown system. We're not asking you to rip anything out.

Workflow Automation Engine

Multi-step AI workflows fail in interesting ways. A document processing job might hit an LLM timeout on step 3 of 7, and you need that retry to pick up exactly where it left off -- not restart from scratch and reprocess six steps you already paid for. We use Inngest or Trigger.dev for durable serverless orchestration, which means retries, observability, and clean integration with CRMs, ERPs, and notification systems are handled properly from day one. Not day 90 when something finally breaks in production.

Cost and Compliance Observability

You can't manage what you can't see. Real-time dashboards give you token usage, cost-per-query, model performance metrics, and a complete audit trail for every AI interaction. Not weekly CSV exports -- actual live visibility, per department, per workflow, per user if you need it. When something looks off, you know in minutes, not at the end of the month when the invoice lands.

よくある質問

How do you handle failover between multiple LLM providers like Claude, GPT-4o, and Gemini?

We build a provider-agnostic orchestration layer that's watching API health, latency, and error rates in real time. When a provider degrades or starts returning 529s, requests automatically reroute to the next-best available model -- with prompt adaptation to handle the differences in how Claude versus GPT-4o versus Gemini expects instructions to be formatted. Token budgets and cost constraints factor into those routing decisions too, not just raw performance. And honestly? No manual intervention required when OpenAI has a bad Tuesday morning. Your users don't notice. Your on-call engineer doesn't get paged at 2am. That alone is worth a lot.

What vector database do you recommend for enterprise RAG pipelines?

For most deployments, we start with Supabase and pgvector -- you get vector search running right alongside your relational queries, row-level security for multi-tenant access, and one fewer infrastructure dependency to explain to your DevOps team. But clients processing millions of documents or needing sub-10ms retrieval are a different conversation. Those get dedicated vector stores -- Pinecone or Weaviate -- running alongside the primary database. It's not a one-size-fits-all call. It depends on your actual query volume and latency requirements, not what sounds impressive in a pitch deck.

How do you reduce hallucinations in RAG-powered AI responses?

We use a multi-layer approach because no single technique gets you there alone. Hybrid retrieval combines dense vectors with BM25 keyword matching. Cross-encoder re-ranking improves chunk relevance before anything hits the LLM. System prompts include strict grounding instructions. Then a secondary verification pass cross-references generated claims against source chunks after the fact. Every response includes page-level citations back to original documents -- because your users shouldn't have to just trust the output. They should be able to verify it in 30 seconds.

What does an enterprise AI integration project cost and how long does it take?

Projects typically run $50,000 to $300,000 depending on document volume, number of LLM workflows, and how many systems we're integrating with. A standard engagement is 12-16 weeks from discovery through production deployment. But you'll have a working MVP at week 8 -- real users, real documents, real workflows -- so you can validate the approach before we harden everything for full production scale. No big reveal at the end where everyone holds their breath and hopes it works.

Can you integrate AI workflows with our existing enterprise systems like Salesforce or SAP?

Yes. The document processing pipelines are event-driven, and we use webhook-based integrations to connect downstream systems. We've built connectors for Salesforce, HubSpot, SAP, SharePoint, and plenty of custom internal tools -- if it has an API, we can wire it in. The orchestration layer triggers actions based on AI processing results: CRM record updates, approval workflows, Slack notifications, whatever the process requires. All of it with audit logging, because in regulated industries that's not optional -- that's the whole ballgame.

How do you handle sensitive enterprise data in AI processing pipelines?

Row-level security in Supabase means document access in RAG queries respects your existing permission model -- someone in the London office doesn't pull documents they shouldn't see just because they phrased a question cleverly. All data stays within your cloud infrastructure. We deploy on your AWS, GCP, or Azure accounts, not ours. For regulated industries -- healthcare, finance, legal -- we add PII detection and redaction before documents ever reach the LLM pipeline. And all API calls run under enterprise-tier provider agreements with data processing addendums already in place.

この能力が実際に機能している例

NAS Equipment Directory Platform

Data pipeline and search architecture managing 137K+ listings that informed our RAG ingestion and retrieval patterns

Astrology Content Platform

91K+ dynamically generated pages proving performant Next.js frontends on top of heavy content processing pipelines

Real-Time Auction Platform

Sub-200ms streaming architecture that directly translates to low-latency LLM response delivery

Korean Manufacturer Global Hub

Multi-tenant internationalized platform across 30 languages demonstrating enterprise-scale data architecture

Headless CMS Development

Content management architecture patterns that power document ingestion and structured content delivery in AI workflows
エンタープライズ支援

Schedule Discovery Session

プラットフォームアーキテクチャをマッピングし、目に見えないリスクを明らかにし、現実的なスコープを提示します — 無料、コミットメント不要。

Schedule Discovery Call
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →