Skip to content
Now accepting new projects — limited slots available. Get started →
LLM featuresRAG and agentsFixed priceSenior team

Hire an AI Developer -- or Hand Us the Whole Build

You searched for an AI developer. What you probably need is a shipped product: AI features that work, built by a senior team that uses AI tooling without shipping AI slop.

We build LLM features, RAG pipelines, and AI agents into production Next.js and Astro stacks. Skip the contractor vetting cycle: fixed quotes, senior engineers, code you can actually maintain after handoff.

2-6 weeks
Typical AI feature build
Scoped, evaluated, and deployed to production
$5K-$25K
Fixed-price range
Locked before build starts, no hourly drift
0
Vetting hours needed
Skip the interview cycle; see scoped output in week one

Here's what hiring an AI developer should actually get you: shipped, reliable functionality that holds up when real users hit it. That might be a chat assistant that answers from your own data, document automation that doesn't fall apart on a messy PDF, or agent workflows with actual guardrails instead of just vibes. But honestly, the title "AI developer" covers two pretty different skill sets -- engineers who build AI features into products, and engineers who use AI tooling to build faster. The teams worth hiring do both. They're accountable for how the thing behaves in production, what tokens cost at scale, and what happens when it fails -- not just whether the demo looked good on a Tuesday afternoon Zoom call. That last part is where most hires go wrong. You get a working demo, everyone's excited, and then three weeks into integration you realize nobody thought about failure modes, cost ceilings, or what "done" actually means on real inputs.

What is holding your current website back?

Common gaps we find in nearly every audit.

Vetting AI freelancers takes 15 to 30 hours of your time -- and the job title tells you almost nothing useful
Risk: The "AI developer" label covers everyone from prompt hobbyists to production ML engineers with a decade of deployed systems, and their profiles can look identical at a glance. A wrong hire costs you the contract fee plus roughly a month of runway. You usually don't find out until integration time, which is the worst possible moment.
Your demo worked
Risk: Real users will break it inside a week. Demos run on clean, hand-picked inputs. Production sees adversarial prompts, malformed documents, edge-case languages, and the kind of stuff nobody thought to test. Without proper evaluation suites and guardrails in place, every incident becomes a support ticket -- or worse, a screenshot making the rounds on social media.
Token costs have a way of growing faster than actual usage does
Risk: Send unrouted traffic to a frontier model with no caching and you're looking at unit costs 5 to 20 times higher than a properly tuned setup. The feature gets celebrated internally as a win while margins quietly invert underneath it.
Your team is shipping slower than competitors who've adopted AI tooling -- and the gap is compounding
Risk: Teams running Claude Code and similar tools are shipping comparable features in roughly half the calendar time. That doesn't show up as an engineering metric. It shows up in sales conversations as missing product, and by the time you notice it, the quarterly gap has already widened.

What Your Website Could Look Like

Custom-designed for your industry. No templates. No stock photos.

AI developer hire page mockup with LLM feature dashboard
Senior AI developers: LLM features, RAG, and agents shipped to production

How We Build This Right

Every safeguard, built in from Day 1.

No black-box handoffs

Every integration ships with documented architecture decisions, environment variable conventions, and inline comments explaining non-obvious prompt and retrieval logic so your team can own it after we leave.

Data handling boundaries stated upfront

We confirm which data touches third-party model APIs, what stays on your infrastructure, and where embeddings are stored before a line of code is written, so you can make informed compliance decisions.

Deterministic test coverage on AI paths

LLM outputs are non-deterministic, but the surrounding logic is not. We write unit and integration tests for retrieval pipelines, tool-call schemas, and fallback handling so CI catches regressions.

What We Build

Purpose-built features for your industry.

AI features built for production, not demo day

What we actually build: LLM chat grounded in your data, retrieval pipelines, document extraction, agent workflows. Each one ships with an evaluation suite, fallbacks, and monitoring. The definition of done here is behavior on real inputs. Not a recorded demo, not a clean notebook -- production behavior.

AI-assisted delivery on the whole build

We run Claude Code across the full stack every day, which is why our fixed quotes land at freelancer prices while still carrying agency accountability. The AI writes a lot of the code. Senior engineers own the architecture and review every single line before it ships. That's the arrangement, and it's why the economics work.

Cost engineering from the first commit

Model routing, response caching, and per-feature budget caps get wired in during the build itself -- not bolted on afterward. So when you launch, you already know what this costs per user and per feature. Alerts fire before spend drifts, not after your AWS bill arrives.

Rescue for stalled AI projects

We audit first: prompts, retrieval quality, agent loops, and spend. Then we deliver a fixed-price fix plan. Most rescues ship inside three weeks, because in practice the problem is almost always architecture -- not the model itself.

Plain-English delivery

Weekly updates written in product terms, a staging URL from week one, and documentation your next hire can actually onboard from without calling us. No black boxes. No dependency on us after handover. That's the standard.

Built on a Modern, Secure Stack

Next.jsAstroSupabaseVercelClaude Code

Our Development Process

From discovery to launch. Quality at every step.

Scope the outcome, not the tech

It's a 2 to 3 day sprint. We define what the AI feature needs to do on real inputs, what failure actually looks like, and what this will cost per month at scale. You approve the spec and the fixed price together before anything gets built.

Build against an evaluation suite

We write the eval cases before the feature. Representative inputs, edge cases, red lines -- all of it defined upfront. Every iteration gets measured against them. That's the difference between engineering and prompt-tinkering, and it's not a small difference.

Ship behind a kill switch

Staged rollout with monitoring on quality, latency, and spend. If any metric crosses the agreed line, the feature degrades gracefully instead of taking down the product with it. That's the deal.

Handover with the levers labeled

You get the repo, prompts, evals, dashboards, and a working session with your team on how to tune each part. Plus 30 days of post-launch cover, included in the fixed price. Nothing locked away, nothing that requires us to operate it.

Social Animal

Ready to discuss your hire an ai developer -- or hand us the whole build project?

Get a free quote

Frequently Asked Questions

Two things, usually. Building AI features into products -- LLM chat, retrieval-augmented search, document processing, agent workflows -- and using AI tooling like Claude Code to ship conventional software faster. We do both. Honestly, most projects end up needing both before they're done.
A single freelancer makes sense for a narrow, well-specified feature. But if the project involves product decisions, infrastructure, evaluation, and deployment? A small senior team is faster and usually cheaper than the full interview-hire-manage cycle for one contractor.
Senior AI contractors are billing $100 to $250 an hour on open-ended terms right now. We work the opposite way -- scoped, fixed quotes per project. Typical AI feature builds run $5K to $25K. Full AI products run $15K to $60K. You know the number before we start.
Anthropic Claude and OpenAI models sit behind a provider-agnostic layer, so we're not married to either. Postgres with pgvector or a dedicated vector store for retrieval, depending on scale. Next.js on Vercel for the product layer. Every choice here is boring on purpose -- production reliability beats chasing whoever's on top of the leaderboard this month.
Yes. Honestly, about half our AI work is rescue at this point. Prompts that behave in demos but fall apart on real inputs, RAG pipelines retrieving the wrong context entirely, agent loops burning tokens in circles. We audit first, then quote the fix at a fixed price. No open-ended hourly tab while we figure it out.
Caching, model routing, and hard budget caps are part of every build -- not something we add later when the bill shows up. We instrument per-feature token spend from day one. So you see cost per user before scale has a chance to surprise you, and cheaper models handle the traffic they're actually capable of handling.
More solutions

Explore related industries

Need enterprise scale?

200+ employee company? Complex multi-tenant, auction, or multi-location requirement? We have a dedicated enterprise capability track.

View Enterprise Hub

Tell us about your project

We reply within one business day with a scoped, fixed-price plan.

Or book a 30-minute call
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →