Skip to content
Now accepting Q2 projects — limited slots available. Get started →
English 한국어 日本語 Nederlands Portugues Deutsch 中文 繁體中文 Espanol العربية Francais
Core Services
Next.jsSupabaseAWS InfrastructureSSO/SAML AuthSOC 2 Compliant

Enterprise Software Development for Engineering Teams

Your Enterprise Platform Ships in Quarters, Not Years

90+
Lighthouse score
Mobile, production
8-16 weeks
Typical timeline
MVP to full platform
$75K-$500K
Project range
Scope and compliance tier
5,000+
Sites shipped
Since 2012
What Enterprise Software Development Fixes — And What Vendor Timelines Hide

Your engineering team opens the codebase and sees a monolith that takes 45 minutes to deploy. Enterprise software development means building platforms that don't collapse under real load or fail security reviews — role-based dashboards, SSO/SAML flows, Postgres row-level security, CI/CD pipelines on AWS, audit trails that pass SOC 2 Type II without last-minute retrofits. We center your stack on Next.js for the application layer — server components, API routes, edge middleware — deployed on Vercel or self-hosted AWS depending on your compliance posture. Supabase handles auth, Postgres, real-time subscriptions, storage. AWS fills gaps: S3, SQS, Lambda for background jobs, CloudFront, VPCs when you need network isolation. We've shipped platforms for manufacturing analytics companies, construction tech startups, civil engineering firms managing thousands of concurrent field users. The pattern: teams of 4-8, 8-16 week delivery windows, Lighthouse scores above 90 at launch. If your current vendor quotes a 6-month timeline and a Java monolith, that's probably two quarters and $200K more than your business needs to burn.

專案失敗的原因

Your current platform runs on a monolith that takes 45 minutes to deploy and can't scale individual services. Every feature release becomes a full regression cycle, burning $20K-$50K per quarter in QA overhead alone.
Your offshore team shipped code that doesn't pass basic security review, and your enterprise clients are asking for SOC 2 documentation. You lose the deal — or worse, you sign the contract and fail the audit six months in.
Engineers spend more time fighting the framework than building features because someone picked a stack five years ago that nobody maintains anymore. Attrition climbs as senior devs leave for teams with modern tooling, and hiring costs double.
Authentication is duct-taped together with a custom JWT system that doesn't support SSO, SAML, or MFA. One breach or one failed pen test and your largest customer's security team shuts down the integration.
Your app loads in 8+ seconds on mobile and field teams in low-connectivity environments can't use it reliably. Adoption stalls below 40%, leadership questions the investment, and the project gets shelved.
There's no CI/CD pipeline, staging environment, or automated testing — every deploy is a manual, high-risk event. Production incidents happen bi-weekly, and your team spends Friday nights rolling back instead of shipping.

我們構建的內容

Stop burning $20K–$50K per quarter on full regression cycles because your monolith can't deploy individual services

Ship features independently with server components and parallel routes — no full-app deployments, no 45-minute wait times

Kill the custom JWT duct tape that blocks SSO, SAML, and MFA before your largest customer's security team shuts you down

Pass SOC 2 audits on day one with SSO/SAML integration, MFA, and Postgres RLS policies that enforce data isolation at the database layer

End the 8-second mobile load times that strand field teams in low-connectivity zones and stall adoption below 40%

Hit sub-second page loads on mobile with edge middleware and structured codebases that deliver 90+ Lighthouse scores at launch

Escape the offshore codebase that doesn't pass basic security review and puts your enterprise deals at risk

Scale real-time data pipelines with Supabase subscriptions, AWS SQS, and Lambda — field data and IoT payloads flow without blocking your UI

Replace the framework nobody maintains that drives senior devs to quit and doubles your hiring costs

Deploy with confidence using GitHub Actions pipelines, preview environments on every PR, and automated Lighthouse checks that block merges below threshold

Eliminate manual Friday-night rollbacks because there's no CI/CD, no staging, no automated tests

Reproduce every environment with Terraform-managed VPCs, S3, Lambda, SQS, and CloudFront — version-controlled infrastructure, zero manual config drift

我們的流程

01

Architecture & Threat Modeling

We map your data model, auth requirements, compliance constraints, and integration points into a technical spec and infrastructure diagram.
Week 1-2
02

Foundation Sprint

We stand up the Next.js app, Supabase project, AWS infrastructure, CI/CD pipeline, and SSO/SAML auth — a working skeleton your team can log into.
Week 3-5
03

Feature Build Cycles

Two-week sprints delivering 3-5 features per cycle with preview deployments, stakeholder reviews, and automated test coverage expanding with each merge.
Week 6-12
04

Security Hardening & Load Testing

Pen testing, RLS policy audit, load simulation at 3x projected traffic, and SOC 2 evidence collection for your compliance review.
Week 13-14
05

Launch & Handoff

Production cutover, runbook documentation, team training sessions, and a 30-day post-launch support window with defined SLA.
Week 15-16

常見問題

企業軟體開發實際成本是多少?

我們大多數企業協議介於 $75K 至 $500K 之間。具有驗證、儀表板和幾個整合的焦點內部工具在 8-10 週內運行 $75K-$150K。具有 SSO/SAML、SOC 2 合規性、即時資料和多租戶架構的完整客戶面向平台在 12-16 週內推送 $200K-$500K。變數不是我們的費率——是您的範圍。我們將在付費發現衝刺後為您提供固定價格提案,以便沒有驚喜。

為什麼選擇 Next.js 和 Supabase 而不是傳統企業堆疊?

傳統企業堆疊——Spring Boot、.NET、Angular——伴隨著巨大的開銷:緩慢的構建、沉重的基礎設施和 15+ 人的團隊僅維持正常運行。Next.js 在一個框架中為我們提供伺服器端渲染、API 路由和邊緣中間件。Supabase 為我們提供 Postgres、驗證、即時和儲存,無需管理單獨的後端。結果是 4-8 人的團隊在 8-16 週內運送傳統堆疊需要 6-12 個月和預算的兩倍。您的維護成本也會下降——移動部件越少意味著故障越少。

您如何處理 SOC 2 合規性要求?

我們從第一天開始將合規性融入架構中。這意味著在每個變動上進行審計日誌記錄、透過 AWS KMS 進行靜態加密、透過 TLS 1.3 進行傳輸加密、用於資料隔離的 Supabase RLS 原則,以及用於存取控制的 SSO/SAML 和 MFA。我們生成審計員需要的證據工件——存取日誌、變更管理記錄、事件回應程序。我們支援團隊完成 SOC 2 Type I 和 Type II 審計。我們不會自己進行審計,但我們建立的平台可以通過審計。

企業協議上工作的團隊規模是多少?

通常 4-8 人:一名技術負責人、2-4 名工程師、一名 DevOps/基礎設施專家和一名專案經理。對於 SOC 2 協議,我們將添加安全工程師。團隊中的每個人都曾運送過生產 Next.js 和 Supabase 程式碼——我們不會在企業工作中配備初級人員。您將有一個單一的聯絡點和業務時間內整個團隊的非同步 Slack 存取權。

您可以與我們現有的系統和 API 整合嗎?

是的。大多數企業專案涉及與 3-10 個外部系統的整合——ERP、CRM、SCADA 平台、舊版 REST API、SFTP 檔案拖放。我們使用 Next.js API 路由和 AWS Lambda 建立整合層,使用 SQS 進行非同步處理和用於失敗處理的死信佇列。我們已與 SAP、Salesforce、Procore、Autodesk 和許多專有內部 API 整合。如果它有 API 或匯出檔案,我們就可以連接到它。

您的方法與離岸團隊相比如何?

離岸團隊通常前期報價低 30-50%,但交付時間為 2-3 倍,返工為 2-3 倍。我們已經重新構建了離岸團隊開始的平台——這是我們每季度看到的一個模式。我們的堆疊優勢是真實的:Next.js + Supabase + AWS 讓 6 人團隊超越更重堆疊上的 20 人團隊。您將花費更少的總成本、更快地運送,並獲得您的內部工程師在交付後實際可以維護的程式碼。

啟動後會發生什麼——您提供持續支援嗎?

每項企業協議都包括 30 天的啟動後支援視窗,具有定義的 SLA——通常對於關鍵問題為 4 小時回應,對於非關鍵為 24 小時。之後,我們提供月度維持計畫,起價為 $5K/月,用於持續功能開發、基礎設施管理和待命支援。我們約 60% 的企業客戶轉移到維持計畫。其餘的採用程式碼、文件和運行手冊並自行運行——堆疊是為此設計的。

您在效能和正常運行時間方面提供什麼保證?

我們保證在啟動時在行動版上達到 90+ Lighthouse 分數——這在合約中。對於正常運行時間,我們使用 Vercel 的邊緣網路或多 AZ AWS 部署架構,根據您的託管要求達到 99.9% 可用性。負載測試在啟動前以 3 倍的預計峰值流量進行。如果效能在啟動後 90 天內低於同意的閾值,我們免費修復它。您會獲得在壓力下執行的生產系統,而不是在投影機上看起來不錯的演示。

Next.js DevelopmentSupabase Backend DevelopmentSOC 2 Compliance for Web AppsMigrate from Legacy Monolith to Next.jsNext.js vs. Custom Java Stack

Get Your Quote

Most quotes delivered within 24 hours.

Get Started
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →