Skip to content
Now accepting Q2 projects — limited slots available. Get started →
English 한국어 日本語 Nederlands Portugues Deutsch 中文 繁體中文 Espanol العربية Francais
Core Services
Next.jsSupabaseAWS InfrastructureSSO/SAML AuthSOC 2 Compliant

企业软件开发 — 为工程团队打造

您的企业平台将在几个季度内交付,而非数年

90+
Lighthouse score
Mobile, production
8-16 weeks
Typical timeline
MVP to full platform
$75K-$500K
Project range
Scope and compliance tier
5,000+
Sites shipped
Since 2012
What Enterprise Software Development Fixes — And What Vendor Timelines Hide

Your engineering team opens the codebase and sees a monolith that takes 45 minutes to deploy. Enterprise software development means building platforms that don't collapse under real load or fail security reviews — role-based dashboards, SSO/SAML flows, Postgres row-level security, CI/CD pipelines on AWS, audit trails that pass SOC 2 Type II without last-minute retrofits. We center your stack on Next.js for the application layer — server components, API routes, edge middleware — deployed on Vercel or self-hosted AWS depending on your compliance posture. Supabase handles auth, Postgres, real-time subscriptions, storage. AWS fills gaps: S3, SQS, Lambda for background jobs, CloudFront, VPCs when you need network isolation. We've shipped platforms for manufacturing analytics companies, construction tech startups, civil engineering firms managing thousands of concurrent field users. The pattern: teams of 4-8, 8-16 week delivery windows, Lighthouse scores above 90 at launch. If your current vendor quotes a 6-month timeline and a Java monolith, that's probably two quarters and $200K more than your business needs to burn.

项目失败的原因

Your current platform runs on a monolith that takes 45 minutes to deploy and can't scale individual services. Every feature release becomes a full regression cycle, burning $20K-$50K per quarter in QA overhead alone.
Your offshore team shipped code that doesn't pass basic security review, and your enterprise clients are asking for SOC 2 documentation. You lose the deal — or worse, you sign the contract and fail the audit six months in.
Engineers spend more time fighting the framework than building features because someone picked a stack five years ago that nobody maintains anymore. Attrition climbs as senior devs leave for teams with modern tooling, and hiring costs double.
Authentication is duct-taped together with a custom JWT system that doesn't support SSO, SAML, or MFA. One breach or one failed pen test and your largest customer's security team shuts down the integration.
Your app loads in 8+ seconds on mobile and field teams in low-connectivity environments can't use it reliably. Adoption stalls below 40%, leadership questions the investment, and the project gets shelved.
There's no CI/CD pipeline, staging environment, or automated testing — every deploy is a manual, high-risk event. Production incidents happen bi-weekly, and your team spends Friday nights rolling back instead of shipping.

我们构建的内容

Stop burning $20K–$50K per quarter on full regression cycles because your monolith can't deploy individual services

Ship features independently with server components and parallel routes — no full-app deployments, no 45-minute wait times

Kill the custom JWT duct tape that blocks SSO, SAML, and MFA before your largest customer's security team shuts you down

Pass SOC 2 audits on day one with SSO/SAML integration, MFA, and Postgres RLS policies that enforce data isolation at the database layer

End the 8-second mobile load times that strand field teams in low-connectivity zones and stall adoption below 40%

Hit sub-second page loads on mobile with edge middleware and structured codebases that deliver 90+ Lighthouse scores at launch

Escape the offshore codebase that doesn't pass basic security review and puts your enterprise deals at risk

Scale real-time data pipelines with Supabase subscriptions, AWS SQS, and Lambda — field data and IoT payloads flow without blocking your UI

Replace the framework nobody maintains that drives senior devs to quit and doubles your hiring costs

Deploy with confidence using GitHub Actions pipelines, preview environments on every PR, and automated Lighthouse checks that block merges below threshold

Eliminate manual Friday-night rollbacks because there's no CI/CD, no staging, no automated tests

Reproduce every environment with Terraform-managed VPCs, S3, Lambda, SQS, and CloudFront — version-controlled infrastructure, zero manual config drift

我们的流程

01

Architecture & Threat Modeling

We map your data model, auth requirements, compliance constraints, and integration points into a technical spec and infrastructure diagram.
Week 1-2
02

Foundation Sprint

We stand up the Next.js app, Supabase project, AWS infrastructure, CI/CD pipeline, and SSO/SAML auth — a working skeleton your team can log into.
Week 3-5
03

Feature Build Cycles

Two-week sprints delivering 3-5 features per cycle with preview deployments, stakeholder reviews, and automated test coverage expanding with each merge.
Week 6-12
04

Security Hardening & Load Testing

Pen testing, RLS policy audit, load simulation at 3x projected traffic, and SOC 2 evidence collection for your compliance review.
Week 13-14
05

Launch & Handoff

Production cutover, runbook documentation, team training sessions, and a 30-day post-launch support window with defined SLA.
Week 15-16

常见问题

企业软件开发实际上成本是多少?

我们大多数企业合作的范围在 75K 到 500K 美元之间。一个专注的内部工具,具有身份验证、仪表板和几个集成,在 8-10 周内成本为 75K-150K 美元。一个完整的面向客户的平台,具有 SSO/SAML、SOC 2 合规、实时数据和多租户架构,在 12-16 周内成本为 200K-500K 美元。可变因素不是我们的费率——而是您的范围。我们将在付费发现冲刺后为您提供固定价格提案,这样就不会有意外。

为什么选择 Next.js 和 Supabase 而不是传统企业堆栈?

传统企业堆栈——Spring Boot、.NET、Angular——带来了巨大的开销:构建缓慢、基础设施庞大,需要 15 人以上的团队才能维持运营。Next.js 在一个框架中为我们提供了服务端渲染、API 路由和边缘中间件。Supabase 为我们提供了 Postgres、身份验证、实时功能和存储,无需管理单独的后端。最终结果是一个 4-8 人的团队在 8-16 周内交付相当于传统堆栈需要 6-12 个月和两倍预算的产品。您的维护成本也会下降——更少的活动部件意味着更少的故障。

您如何处理 SOC 2 合规要求?

我们从第一天起就将合规性融入架构中。这意味着每次变更都有审计日志、通过 AWS KMS 的静态加密、通过 TLS 1.3 的传输加密、Supabase RLS 策略用于数据隔离,以及带有 MFA 的 SSO/SAML 用于访问控制。我们生成审计员需要的证据工件——访问日志、变更管理记录、事件响应程序。我们已经支持团队通过 SOC 2 Type I 和 Type II 审计。我们不进行审计本身,但我们构建的平台能够通过审计。

企业合作中有多少人的团队参与?

通常 4-8 人:一个技术领导、2-4 名工程师、一个 DevOps/基础设施专家和一个项目经理。对于 SOC 2 合作,我们将增加一名安全工程师。团队中的每个人都曾在生产环境中使用 Next.js 和 Supabase 代码——我们不在企业工作中配置初级员工。您将有一个单一的联系点,以及在业务时间内对整个团队的异步 Slack 访问。

您能与我们现有的系统和 API 集成吗?

能。大多数企业项目涉及与 3-10 个外部系统集成——ERP、CRM、SCADA 平台、遗留 REST API、SFTP 文件传输。我们使用 Next.js API 路由和 AWS Lambda 构建集成层,使用 SQS 进行异步处理和死信队列处理失败。我们已经与 SAP、Salesforce、Procore、Autodesk 以及数十个专有内部 API 集成过。如果它有 API 或导出文件,我们就能连接它。

您的方法与离岸团队相比如何?

离岸团队通常前期报价低 30-50%,但交付周期长 2-3 倍,返工量也多 2-3 倍。我们每季度都看到这种模式——被离岸团队启动的平台需要重建。我们的堆栈优势是真实的:Next.js + Supabase + AWS 让一个 6 人团队的效能超过一个 20 人的团队在较重堆栈上的表现。您将花费更少的总成本、更快地交付,并获得您的内部工程师在交接后能够实际维护的代码。

发布后会发生什么——您提供持续支持吗?

每个企业项目包括 30 天的发布后支持窗口,具有明确的 SLA——通常关键问题 4 小时响应,非关键问题 24 小时响应。之后,我们提供从 5K 美元/月起的月度保留计划,用于持续功能开发、基础设施管理和待命支持。约 60% 的企业客户转向保留计划。其余的则获取代码库、文档和运行手册,自己运行——该堆栈就是为此设计的。

您对性能和正常运行时间提供什么保证?

我们保证发布时的移动端 Lighthouse 评分 90+ ——这在合同中。对于正常运行时间,我们使用 Vercel 的边缘网络或多可用区 AWS 部署来设计 99.9% 可用性架构,具体取决于您的托管需求。性能测试在发布前进行,测试流量为预计峰值流量的 3 倍。如果性能在发布后 90 天内降低到低于约定的阈值,我们免费修复。您获得的是在压力下表现良好的生产系统,而不是在投影仪上看起来不错的演示。

Next.js DevelopmentSupabase Backend DevelopmentSOC 2 Compliance for Web AppsMigrate from Legacy Monolith to Next.jsNext.js vs. Custom Java Stack

Get Your Quote

Most quotes delivered within 24 hours.

Get Started
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →