Law Firm Multi-Office Website Development

Per-office LocalBusiness and LegalService schema, per-office city plus practice-area landing pages -- think personal injury attorneys in Miami versus Tampa, those are genuinely different pages -- automated GBP review sync, and NAP consistency enforced at build time. In practice, firms move from page 3 to local-pack top-3 for their highest-value practice areas within 90-120 days.

Yes. Each attorney gets a scoped admin where they update their own bio, photo, bar admissions, notable cases, speaking engagements, and publications -- nothing outside their own profile. Firm marketing controls brand, nav, and firm-wide content. Every edit is audit-logged. And if your ethics-compliance lead needs to review attorney-page edits before they go live, that approval workflow is built in.

For 5-15 offices with 20-80 attorneys, fixed-fee runs $60K-$180K. Larger builds -- 15-50 offices, 100-500 attorneys -- run $150K-$400K. Hosting on Vercel runs $540-$1,800 per year regardless of scale. The 3-year TCO typically comes in 40-60% lower than staying on Consultwebs or Scorpion. That's not a rounding error.

Yes. These agencies build competent sites -- they're just slow WordPress sites. We migrate in 10-14 weeks, preserving every URL with proper 301s, every backlink, every attorney profile. Firms consistently see 50-80% faster LCP after migration, and local rankings for practice-area plus city queries improve meaningfully. The technical debt just isn't there anymore.

Yes -- intake form submissions route directly into the firm's case-management system via API. Conflict-check triggers at submission, before any data routes anywhere. And if the firm wants client-facing visibility, intake-status updates can sync back to a client portal so prospective clients aren't left wondering what happened to their inquiry.

Per-state bar advertising rules are built into the template itself -- mandatory disclaimers in Florida, confidentiality banners in New York, prohibited superlatives handled per state. So compliance isn't a manual checklist anymore. Plus, if the firm's ethics-compliance lead needs to review attorney-page edits before they publish, that approval workflow is available and easy to configure.

Intake forms use conditional logic and are tailored per practice area -- a PI intake looks and behaves completely differently from an estate-planning intake, as it should. Conflict check runs pre-submission. hCaptcha on every form. Every submission hits the case-management system plus the firm CRM with full UTM attribution intact. So your marketing team can actually see which campaigns are driving real matters.

Yes. Spanish-language attorney pages, practice-area pages, and intake forms are common for firms operating in Miami, Texas, and California -- markets where this genuinely moves the needle on client acquisition. Full hreflang, subdirectory routing, and a translation pipeline that keeps everything in sync. Same domain authority across languages, no split SEO, no cannibalization.