Framer vs Astro：哪一個在 2026 年更好？

動畫優先建構器遇上零 JS 效能框架

Quick Answer

Choose Framer for animation-heavy landing pages where motion design is central. Choose Astro for content-driven sites where performance matters — Astro ships zero JS (Lighthouse 95-100) and can use Framer Motion in islands for selective animations.

Framer

The web builder for creative professionals

PricingFree tier + $5-30/mo
API StyleCustom React components + CMS
Learning CurveLow-Moderate
Best ForLanding pages, portfolios, animation-heavy sites
HostingFully managed (Framer hosting only)
Open SourceNo

Astro

The web framework for content-driven websites

PricingFree + hosting from $0/mo
API StyleAny data source + API routes
Learning CurveModerate
Best ForContent-heavy sites, blogs, marketing pages, documentation
HostingVercel, Netlify, Cloudflare, any static host
Open SourceYes

Feature Comparison

FeatureFramerAstro
Forms ✓ —
AI tools ✓ —
Analytics ✓ —
SEO tools ✓ —
Versioning ✓ —
Built-in CMS ✓ —
Localization ✓ —
Custom domain ✓ —
Code components ✓ —
SSL certificate ✓ —
Native animations ✓ —
Responsive design ✓ —
Team collaboration ✓ —
Custom code (React) ✓ —
Component-based builder ✓ —
Actions — ✓
Middleware — ✓
i18n routing — ✓
RSS generation — ✓
Any UI framework — ✓
SSG + SSR hybrid — ✓
Server endpoints — ✓
View transitions — ✓
TypeScript native — ✓
Image optimisation — ✓
Sitemap generation — ✓
Zero JS by default — ✓
Content collections — ✓
Islands architecture — ✓
Markdown/MDX support — ✓

What is Framer?

Framer is a component-based web builder with native animations, exploding in popularity in 2026. Built on React, it lets designers create production sites with smooth animations.

What is Astro?

Astro ships zero JavaScript by default using islands architecture for the fastest content sites possible.

Key Differences

01

JavaScript Payload

Astro ships zero JS by default (20-80KB pages). Framer loads its React runtime plus animation code (500KB-2MB). For content sites, Astro pages are 10-25x lighter.

02

Animation Workflow

Framer has native, visual animation tools — the best in the industry. Astro requires animation libraries and code. For animation-heavy sites, Framer is faster to build.

03

Content Workflow

Astro has built-in Markdown/MDX, content collections, and RSS. Framer has a basic CMS. For content-heavy sites like blogs, Astro is purpose-built.

04

Hosting

Astro deploys anywhere for free. Framer is locked to Framer hosting ($5-30/mo). Over time, Astro saves significantly.

05

Hybrid Approach

You can use Framer Motion (the library) inside Astro islands. This gives Framer-quality animations with zero-JS pages — the best of both worlds, no compromise needed.

Performance Comparison

MetricFramerAstro
TTFB 150ms-500ms 20-80ms (static)
Runtime React-based Node.js / Edge / Static
Page weight 500KB-2MB average 20-80KB typical
Lighthouse score 75-90 typical 95-100

SEO Comparison

SEO FeatureFramerAstro
OG tags ✓ ✓
SSG support ✓ ✓
URL control ✓ ✓
Structured data ✓ ✓
Meta tag control ✓ ✓
Sitemap generation ✓ ✓

Framer

Pros
  • Native buttery animations
  • Component-based visual building
  • React-powered
  • Hot in 2026
Cons
  • No custom backend
  • Limited ecommerce
  • Locked hosting
  • CMS limitations

Astro

Pros
  • Zero JavaScript by default
  • Islands architecture
  • Any UI framework
  • Lighthouse 95-100
Cons
  • Requires developer knowledge
  • No visual builder
  • No built-in animation tools
  • No admin panel

When to Choose Framer

  • Animation-heavy landing pages
  • Design-driven marketing
  • Rapid prototyping
  • Designer-developer hybrid teams

When to Choose Astro

  • Content performance is top priority
  • Perfect Core Web Vitals
  • Blog, docs, or content site
  • Frontend developers on team

Can You Migrate?

Yes. We've completed 100+ platform migrations. We handle data migration, content modeling, frontend rebuilds, and SEO preservation. Every migration is zero-downtime.

Astro Development Performance Optimisation Custom Web Development
Book a free call Send a message

Frequently Asked Questions

Framer 和 Astro 之間有什麼區別？

Framer 是一個具有原生動畫的視覺建構器，在設計師中很受歡迎。Astro 是一個開發人員框架，預設情況下不提供 JavaScript。Framer 擅長運動設計；Astro 擅長原始內容效能。

Astro 比 Framer 快嗎？

是的。Astro 預設情況下提供零 JS（Lighthouse 95-100，頁面小於 80KB）。Framer 的 React 運行時和動畫增加了重量（Lighthouse 75-90，頁面 500KB-2MB）。對於內容網站，Astro 明顯更快。

我可以在 Astro 中使用 Framer 動畫嗎？

可以。您可以在 Astro 島嶼內使用 Framer Motion（動畫庫）。這為您提供 Framer 級別的動畫，同時具有 Astro 的零 JS 預設方法 — 兩全其美。

哪個更適合部落格？

Astro。內置 Markdown/MDX 支持、內容集合、RSS 和零 JS 使 Astro 成為部落格的最佳框架。Framer 的 CMS 更受限制，並添加了不必要的 JavaScript。

哪個更適合著陸頁面？

如果動畫是體驗的中心，選擇 Framer。如果頁面速度和轉換率更重要，選擇 Astro。研究表明更快的頁面轉換效果更好，這通常使 Astro 成為更好的選擇。

我可以從 Framer 遷移到 Astro 嗎？

可以。Social Animal 通過 Astro 島嶼上的優化動畫將 Framer 網站重建為 Astro。您的設計得以保留，同時獲得 2-5 倍更好的效能。

Related Comparisons

Wix vs Next.js Squarespace vs Next.js Wix vs Astro Squarespace vs Astro Webflow vs Astro Webflow vs Next.js Framer vs Next.js Framer vs Webflow
Get in touch

Let's build
something together.

Whether it's a migration, a new build, or an SEO challenge — the Social Animal team would love to hear from you.

Get in touch →