Telemedicine Website Development

We handle encryption at rest and in transit, deploy on BAA-covered infrastructure, enforce role-based access with MFA, and maintain detailed audit logs. Every build goes through a third-party security assessment before launch. We'll also give your compliance officer the documentation they need for internal audits — that part matters more than people expect.

Yes. We build against the FHIR R4 standard, which covers Epic, Cerner, Athenahealth, and most modern EHR platforms. For older systems without FHIR endpoints, we use HL7 middleware or direct API integrations. Data flows bidirectionally — no CSV exports, no manual reconciliation on either side.

A full-featured platform with video, scheduling, patient portal, and EHR integration typically takes 8–10 weeks from kickoff to launch. Simpler builds without EHR integration can ship in 5–6 weeks. You'll get a detailed timeline during the assessment phase, not a vague estimate.

We use WebRTC for peer-to-peer video, with Twilio as a TURN server fallback for patients sitting behind restrictive firewalls. Low-latency, browser-native video — patients don't download anything. Adaptive bitrate handles the mobile network variability that trips up most telehealth platforms.

Yes, completely. You own 100% of the source code, design assets, and infrastructure config. No licensing fees, no per-visit charges, no vendor lock-in. We deploy to your own Vercel or AWS account. If you ever want to bring another team in to maintain it, there's nothing stopping you.

Custom builds start at $18,000 — which is roughly 12–18 months of per-seat SaaS fees for a mid-size practice. The difference is that you own the platform outright, pay zero per-visit fees, and can customize any workflow you want. At scale, that typically translates to $30K–$100K in annual savings compared to staying on SaaS.